Amaury Delmas vs Lofo Ramiaramanan Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L L W L
Form
L L L L L L W L L LH2H: Delmas 1 - 0 Ramiaramanan
They have played 2 sets in total, with Delmas winning 2 and Ramiaramanan winning 0. The last match between Delmas and Ramiaramanan was at the M15+H Bagnoles-de-l'Orne, 12-01-2020, Q1 round, Clay with Amaury Delmas getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Amaury Delmas | 1 |
| Lofo Ramiaramanan | 0 |
M15+H Bagnoles-de-l'Orne(12-01-2020)
6
1
6
4
| Delmas | Stats | Ramiaramanan |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 27 | Age | 35 |
| - | Plays | L |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 53% (79-70) | Career Total W/L | 30% (60-142) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Medvedev VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bencic VS Gauff PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Delmas VS Ramiaramanan H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Amaury Delmas
Player
Lofo Ramiaramanan
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
Delmas VS Ramiaramanan H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:1:0 | Average Match Time | 1:1:0 |
| 57% (29/51) | 1st Serve % | 57% (29/51) |
| 83% (24/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (14/29) |
| 41% (9/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (9/22) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
| 55% (28/51) | Return Points Win % | 35% (18/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Amaury Delmas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Lucas Bouquet
Player
Amaury Delmas
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amaury Delmas
Player
Lofo Ramiaramanan
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Laurent
Player
Amaury Delmas
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolo Turchetti
Player
Amaury Delmas
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
12
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
12 of
45)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
51 of
93)
84
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amaury Delmas
Player
Sabit Suntic
45%
(
13 of
29)
1st Serve %
56%
(
15 of
27)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
100%
(
13 of
13)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
8 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
40
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Antun Vidak
Player
Amaury Delmas
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 4-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Amaury Delmas
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amaury Delmas
Player
Luca George Tatomir
43%
(
19 of
44)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
100%
(
19 of
19)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Lofo Ramiaramanan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Oscar Houille
Player
Lofo Ramiaramanan
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
4
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
5
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(4) 4-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Branger
Player
Lofo Ramiaramanan
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 4-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Antoine Berger
Player
Lofo Ramiaramanan
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Simon Reveniau
Player
Lofo Ramiaramanan
43%
(
23 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc Antoine Gaillard
Player
Lofo Ramiaramanan
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matt Ponchet
Player
Lofo Ramiaramanan
42%
(
22 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Schlagenhauf
Player
Lofo Ramiaramanan
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Schlagenhauf
Player
Lofo Ramiaramanan
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (79/70) | Win/Loss | 30% (60/142) |
| 52% (175/161) | Sets Win/Loss | 32% (143/298) |
| 51% (1547/1516) | Games Win/Loss | 42% (1661/2274) |
| 50% (14/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 38% (17/28) |
| 55% (65/53) | Clay Win/Loss | 36% (30/53) |
| 0% (0/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 18% (13/61) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 100 | Aces Total | 44 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
| 239 | Total Double Faults | 138 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 142.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 281.94 |
| 57% (2998/5219) | 1st Serve % | 59% (1312/2207) |
| 62% (1869/2998) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (733/1312) |
| 45% (991/2221) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (339/895) |
| 46% (231/497) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (44/110) |
| 41% (2016/4890) | Return Points Win % | 32% (639/1992) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 20% (1/4) |
| 53% (79/69) | Futures W/L | 30% (58/136) |
| 52% (76/146) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 30% (59/199) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 56% (14/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (16/34) |
| 51% (20/39) | Deciding Set Win % | 36% (13/36) |
| 86% (81/70) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (61/52) |
| 14% (81/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (61/9) |
| 13% (68/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (141/8) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
